Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F18%3AA1901WDB" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/18:A1901WDB - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00843989:_____/19:E0107793 RIV/61988987:17110/19:A210262C

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85053676790&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Parastomal+and+incisional+hernia+following+laparoscopic%2fopen+abdominoperineal+resection%3a+is+there+a+real+difference%3f&st2=&sid=1ba680b1c5217b0ec" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85053676790&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Parastomal+and+incisional+hernia+following+laparoscopic%2fopen+abdominoperineal+resection%3a+is+there+a+real+difference%3f&st2=&sid=1ba680b1c5217b0ec</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?

Original language description

Background: The aim of the present study was to explore incidence and severity of parastomal hernia (PSH) formation during the first 2 years after open/laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single institution. All patients who underwent laparoscopic/open APR for low rectal cancer within a 10-year study period were assessed for study eligibility. Results: In total, 148 patients were included in the study (97 patients after laparoscopic APR; 51 patients after open APR). There were no statistically significant differences between study subgroups regarding demographic and clinical features. The incidence of PSH detected by physical examination was significantly higher in patients after laparoscopic APR 1 year after the surgery (50.5% vs. 19.6%, p &lt; 0.001) and 2 years after the surgery (57.7% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.001). The incidence of radiologically detected PSH was significantly higher in laparoscopically operated patients after 1 year (58.7% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.007) and after 2 years (61.8% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.004). The mean diameter of PSH was similar in both study subgroups. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly higher in patients who underwent open APR after 1 year (25.5% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.002) and after 2 years (31.3% vs. 7.2%, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: The risk of PSH development after laparoscopic APR appears to be significantly higher in comparison with patients undergoing open APR. Higher incidence of PSH should be considered a potential disadvantage of minimally invasive approach to patients with low rectal cancer. &#169; 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_SC - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30212 - Surgery

Project

—

Continuities

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Publication year

2018

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

ISSN

0930-2794

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

—

Issue of the periodical within the volume

9/2018

Country of publishing house

US - UNITED STATES

Number of pages

6

Pages from-to

—

UT code for WoS article

—

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85053676790