All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Reasons for Implicit Rationing of the Nursing Care Scale: Development, Testing Validity, and Reliability

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F24%3AA25039VS" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/24:A25039VS - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://connect.springerpub.com/lookup/doi/10.1891/JNM-2023-0047" target="_blank" >http://connect.springerpub.com/lookup/doi/10.1891/JNM-2023-0047</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/jnm-2023-0047" target="_blank" >10.1891/jnm-2023-0047</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Reasons for Implicit Rationing of the Nursing Care Scale: Development, Testing Validity, and Reliability

  • Original language description

    <jats:bold>Background and Purpose:</jats:bold>Only a limited number of scales are available, which include a section measuring the reasons for implicit rationing of care. There is no single scale to assess the reasons for implicit rationing of nursing care. The main aim was to develop and psychometrically test a scale assessing the reasons for implicit rationing of nursing care.<jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold>The sample comprises 8,027 nurses. Data were collected from the Czech Republic from September 2019 to October 2020. The construct validity of the instrument was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). To test reliability, Cronbach’s alpha was used.<jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold>The<jats:italic>Reasons for Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care Scale</jats:italic>consists of 10 items and an 11-point Likert-type scale. The EFA identified two main factors with eigenvalues greater than 1.0 (3.815; 2.689) that explain a total of 99.91% of variance. Factor 1 (communication and material resources) contains six items, and Factor 2 (labor resources) contains four items. Cronbach’s coefficient (α) of the scale was .908.<jats:bold>Conclusions:</jats:bold>The<jats:italic>Reasons for Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care Scale</jats:italic>is a short, valid, and reliable scale for routine use in clinical practice.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30307 - Nursing

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/NV18-09-00420" target="_blank" >NV18-09-00420: Rationing of nursing care as one of indicators of the occurrence of nosocomial infections and other adverse events in hospital inpatients</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Nursing Measurement

  • ISSN

    1061-3749

  • e-ISSN

    1945-7049

  • Volume of the periodical

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    601-610

  • UT code for WoS article

    001394479000012

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database