Negotiating access to hard-to-reach populations through institutional gatekeepers in social work research
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17200%2F24%3AA2502NSC" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17200/24:A2502NSC - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/bjsw/advance-article/doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcae039/7637659?utm_source=authortollfreelink&utm_campaign=bjsw&utm_medium=email&guestAccessKey=13952896-040c-4efe-b09e-f4f673734be6" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/bjsw/advance-article/doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcae039/7637659?utm_source=authortollfreelink&utm_campaign=bjsw&utm_medium=email&guestAccessKey=13952896-040c-4efe-b09e-f4f673734be6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae039" target="_blank" >10.1093/bjsw/bcae039</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Negotiating access to hard-to-reach populations through institutional gatekeepers in social work research
Original language description
Institutional gatekeepers play an increasingly important role in social work research, and their involvement in the research process is essential for the development of a usable knowledge base. This paper explores the experience of recruiting participants through institutional gatekeepers for research on hard-to-reach populations in social work. The paper aims to find out how researchers negotiate access to research participants with institutional gatekeepers. A qualitative research strategy was used to accomplish this goal. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews with researchers revealed that the researchers enter into negotiations with institutional gatekeepers with some idea of the challenges and risks, but in part they enter into the unknown and are forced to make situational assessments in joint interactions. Research evolves and transforms based on how the researcher moves through the research process, what types of gatekeepers the researcher seeks at different stages of the research process, and for what purpose. We identified three basic forms of negotiating access with institutional gatekeepers: logistical assistance, barter transaction, and trust-based collaboration.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
The British Journal of Social Work
ISSN
0045-3102
e-ISSN
1468-263X
Volume of the periodical
—
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
18
Pages from-to
2790-2807
UT code for WoS article
001193253700001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85202876472