Sum or mean in calculation of qualitative scoring methods using the Dragonfly Biotic Index, and an alternative approach facilitating conservation prioritization
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F24%3AA25038DM" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/24:A25038DM - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61989592:15310/24:73627819
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-62017-y" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-62017-y</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62017-y" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41598-024-62017-y</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Sum or mean in calculation of qualitative scoring methods using the Dragonfly Biotic Index, and an alternative approach facilitating conservation prioritization
Original language description
Qualitative scoring methods are tools for rapid freshwater health assessments. Total score is often calculated as the sum or mean of the values of the species involved, with minor nuances in interpretation, but with significant implications. We used the Dragonfly Biotic Index (DBI) calculated on Central European odonate species to demonstrate these implications. Each species within a community has a score ranging from 0 (widespread generalists) to 9 (sensitive specialists). A total score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all species (DBI<jats:sub>sum</jats:sub>) or is calculated by dividing by species richness (DBI<jats:sub>mean</jats:sub>). Despite this duality, there has been little debate on either approach. Using simulated scenarios (high vs low richness, presence or absence of high- or low-scoring species), we tested the implications of DBI<jats:sub>sum</jats:sub> and DBI<jats:sub>mean</jats:sub> and suggested a total score calculation for conservation prioritization based on permutation. This algorithm shows the percentile of a community compared to a set of randomly assembled communities of the same species richness. We also present the ‘dragDBI’ package for the statistical software R, a tool for more automated DBI-based environmental health assessments. Our permutational calculation is applicable to other macroinvertebrate-based scoring methods, such as the Biological Monitoring Working Party and the Average Score Per Taxon.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10618 - Ecology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Scientific Reports
ISSN
2045-2322
e-ISSN
2045-2322
Volume of the periodical
—
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
001227448800002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85193546636