Evaluation of Indicators of Public Administration in EU Countries by Use of Multidimensional Analysis
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17450%2F20%3AA2102789" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17450/20:A2102789 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/28/4/1136" target="_blank" >https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/28/4/1136</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46585/sp28041136" target="_blank" >10.46585/sp28041136</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Evaluation of Indicators of Public Administration in EU Countries by Use of Multidimensional Analysis
Original language description
The paper evaluates public administration from the viewpoint of selected indicators focused on the quality of government, corruption rate, e-public services and finance (government expenditures on public administration). The research covers the period 2012-2018 for the selected set of 28 EU countries and applies factor analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Results of the factor analysis showed that three economically developed countries, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, attained the best results of public administration. By contrast, countries with the worst total results of public administration and a low economic level are Bulgaria, Romania, and Poland. Based on the evaluation of common indicators of public administration (performance of public administration and expenditures on public administration) using hierarchical cluster analysis, the EU countries were divided into four clusters by their internal similarity. The largest similarity in the performance of public administration is seen in two groups of countries, i.e. 16 countries. The largest similarity by government expenditures on public administration is seen in the countries in the second and fourth cluster, i.e. 17 countries. Following the analysed public administration indicators, the results also showed a link to traditional models of public administration in the majority of similar countries. This fact supports the specific features of administrative systems and the role related to management and evaluation of public administration.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50602 - Public administration
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration
ISSN
1804-8048
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
28
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
1-11
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85098219779