All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of bone mineral density of runners with inactive males: A cross-sectional 4HAIE study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17450%2F24%3AA25039WL" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17450/24:A25039WL - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306715" target="_blank" >https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306715</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306715" target="_blank" >10.1371/journal.pone.0306715</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of bone mineral density of runners with inactive males: A cross-sectional 4HAIE study

  • Original language description

    The purpose of the study was to determine whether running is associated with greater bone mineral density (BMD) by comparing the BMD of regularly active male runners (AR) with inactive nonrunner male controls (INC). This cross-sectional study recruited 327 male AR and 212 male INC (aged 18–65) via a stratified recruitment strategy. BMD of the whole body (WB) and partial segments (spine, lumbar spine (LS), leg, hip, femoral neck (FN), and arm for each side) were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and lower leg dominance (dominant-D/nondominant-ND) was established by functional testing. An ANCOVA was used to compare AR and INC. The AR had greater BMD for all segments of the lower limb (p&lt;0.05), but similar BMD for all segments of the upper limb (p&gt;0.05) compared with INC. Based on the pairwise comparison of age groups, AR had greater BMD of the ND leg in every age group compared with INC (p&lt;0.05). AR had grater BMD of the D leg in every age group except for (26–35 and 56–65) compare with INC (p&lt;0.05). In the youngest age group (18–25), AR had greater BMD in every measured part of lower extremities (legs, hips, femoral necks) compared with INC (p&lt;0.05). In the 46–55 age group AR had greater BMD than INC (p &lt; 0.05) only in the WB, D Leg, D neck, and ND leg. In the 56–65 age group AR had greater BMD than INC (p&lt;0.05) only in the ND leg. Overall, AR had greater BMD compared with INC in all examined sites except for the upper limbs, supporting the notion that running may positively affect bone parameters. However, the benefits differ in the skeletal sites specifically, as the legs had the highest BMD difference between AR and INC. Moreover, the increase in BMD from running decreased with age.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30306 - Sport and fitness sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    O - Projekt operacniho programu

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    PLOS ONE

  • ISSN

    1932-6203

  • e-ISSN

    1932-6203

  • Volume of the periodical

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    001288771300030

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85201059923