Numerical modelling for circle tunnel under static and dynamic loads (Case study: Comparison in different of elastic modulus and tunnel diameters)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27120%2F17%3A10237841" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27120/17:10237841 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/12/S02.080" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/12/S02.080</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/12/S02.080" target="_blank" >10.5593/sgem2017/12/S02.080</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Numerical modelling for circle tunnel under static and dynamic loads (Case study: Comparison in different of elastic modulus and tunnel diameters)
Original language description
Most of researchers explain that shallow tunnels suffer higher damage compared to deep structures. Many numerical analyses were carried out in order to verify and compare the stresses, forces and bending moments acting on tunnel lining according with the seismic design. After tunnel modelling in MIDAS GTS NX to investigate the tunnel simulation in order to highlight the effect of static and dynamic load on the behaviour of tunnel lining for different cases and calculated the value of each mesh node based on 3D finite element method to simulate the effect of earthquake on tunnel were undertaken to investigate the comparison in different tunnel diameter and different modulus of elasticity response conditions to compare the results in the displacement, maximum principle stress and minimum principle stress acting in the tunnel lining. Design response spectrum of UBC (1997) is used as seismic response spectrum. Due to the application of the static load the stress-strain state around the tunnel periphery is changed, the primary stress state is disrupted and the potential of instability increases, otherwise the result show that the applied dynamic stress is not negligible for underground structure, but it is less dangerous in comparison with the others.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20102 - Construction engineering, Municipal and structural engineering
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/TE01020168" target="_blank" >TE01020168: Centre for Effective and Sustainable Transport Infrastructure (CESTI)</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
SGEM 2017 : proceedings of the 17th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference, Issue 12 : June 29 – July 5, 2017, Albena, Bulgaria
ISBN
978-619-7105-99-5
ISSN
1314-2704
e-ISSN
neuvedeno
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
627-634
Publisher name
STEF92 Technology Ltd.
Place of publication
Sofia
Event location
Albena
Event date
Jun 29, 2017
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—