All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of selected capacity calculations for roundabouts

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27120%2F18%3A10240677" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27120/18:10240677 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://10.5593/sgem2018/6.3/S27.067" target="_blank" >http://10.5593/sgem2018/6.3/S27.067</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/6.3/S27.067" target="_blank" >10.5593/sgem2018/6.3/S27.067</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of selected capacity calculations for roundabouts

  • Original language description

    The paper deals with comparison of selected capacity calculations for roundabouts used in the Czech Republic. Some traffic engineers use the qualitative methods based on Germany methodology HBS, but some ones still use the quantitative methods for capacity assessment of roundabouts. The quantitative methods are based on the traffic volumes on entries and circulatory roadway of roundabout and they usually use an array of coefficients which represent next roundabout parameters. The qualitative methods are also based on the traffic volumes on entries and circulatory roadway of roundabout and they minutely deal with numbers of traffic lanes, time spaces and mainly average delay times (e.g. critical gap and follow-time) and level of service for entries. The method used in the Czech Republic also deals with the capacity of the exits, including influence of pedestrians on pedestrian crossings and volume/capacity ratio for exits. Attention is also paid to the other types of roundabouts, i.e. not only single-lane and double-lane roundabouts, but also mini and turbo roundabouts. This paper presents the results of calculations by both types of methods for various types of roundabouts and shows the differences used methods.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20101 - Civil engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference : SGEM 2018 : conference proceedings : 2 July - 8 July, 2018, Albena, Bulgaria. Volume 18. Issue 6.3

  • ISBN

    978-619-7408-52-2

  • ISSN

    1314-2704

  • e-ISSN

    1314-2704

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    519-526

  • Publisher name

    STEF92 Technology Ltd.

  • Place of publication

    Sofia

  • Event location

    Albena

  • Event date

    Jul 2, 2018

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article