All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Methodology for Assessment of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport Using AHP Method

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F18%3A10238262" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/18:10238262 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-74454-4_28" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-74454-4_28</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_28" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_28</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Methodology for Assessment of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport Using AHP Method

  • Original language description

    The article deals with the choice of electronic payment systems in public transport. In this case, one of the expert methods of multicriteria evaluation of variants must be used. The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method was se-lected for evaluating the variants of electronic payment systems. This method is currently one of the most frequently used multicriteria assessment methods thanks its completeness, simplicity and wide range of uses. The method AHP us-es the decomposition of a complex unstructured situation into individual criteria, which are arranged in a hierarchical structure. This method was used to determine the weights of criteria that were set based on both carrier and passenger require-ments. Paired comparison method was used at each level of the hierarchical struc-ture to compare each criterion with the other criteria. The result of the comparison is the weight of the individual criteria. In the next subchapters of the article partial evaluation of variants of electronic payment systems was made, the synthesis of these evaluations was presented and the most suitable variant was chosen. Final-ly, the advantages and disadvantages of the AHP method and the recommenda-tions regarding its use in practice are mentioned.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20104 - Transport engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Volume 36

  • ISSN

    2367-3370

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    36

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    24 January 2018

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    290-299

  • UT code for WoS article

    000434081600028

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database