COMPARISON OF BASIC MAINTENANCE CONCEPTS USING WITNESS

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F21%3A10248357" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/21:10248357 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.mmscience.eu/journal/issues/december-2021/articles/comparison-of-basic-maintenance-concepts-using-witness" target="_blank" >https://www.mmscience.eu/journal/issues/december-2021/articles/comparison-of-basic-maintenance-concepts-using-witness</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2021_12_2021114" target="_blank" >10.17973/MMSJ.2021_12_2021114</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
COMPARISON OF BASIC MAINTENANCE CONCEPTS USING WITNESS
Original language description
Maintenance is a complex, extensive and important issue in terms of its impact on the quality of manufactured products or services provided in all areas of industry. The importance of predictive maintenance for the industry in the 21st century is crucial. However, the right approach to maintenance management is often underestimated in many companies today, although it can have a very positive effect on the company's efficiency. Using the example of a practical application, the paper includes a comparison of three main maintenance concepts - classical (reactive), planned, predictive through the simulation software Witness. Maintenance concepts are compared in terms of their ability to solve and eliminate failures that occur in production facilities during operation.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20301 - Mechanical engineering

Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)