All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Power Load Forecasting Using Machine Learning Methods

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F25%3A10260004" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/25:10260004 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989100:27730/25:10260004

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-032-13048-8_5" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-032-13048-8_5</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-13048-8_5" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-032-13048-8_5</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Power Load Forecasting Using Machine Learning Methods

  • Original language description

    Short-term power load forecasting (STPLF) is essential to the power grid system. Forecasting the power load process can help reduce electricity production costs and optimize power quality. Many studies are in this field, but it is necessary to improve the accuracy of the forecast. For example, forecasting short-term demand power is essential for operating an off-grid system. This article tested three models for forecasting power load in the short term: Decision Tree (DT), Boosting DT, and Bagging DT. The data set was measured in the off-grid labs at the VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic. The data set was clustered using k-means clustering, and the distance between the samples and each cluster was measured, which was fed to the forecast stage. Using three new space features reduced the computation complexity of the training and testing phases. The performance of the designed models was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. The Bagging DT achieved the lowest forecast error, followed by Boosting DT and standard DT. In contrast, the standard DT took a shorter time to test one sample than the ensemble DTs.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20201 - Electrical and electronic engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    O - Projekt operacniho programu

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Volume 466

  • ISBN

    978-3-032-13047-1

  • ISSN

    2190-3018

  • e-ISSN

    2190-3026

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    57-70

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • Event location

    Ostrava

  • Event date

    Jul 21, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article