All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparative Analysis of the Use of Renewable Energy Sources in Selected Single-family Houses

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F25%3A10260418" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/25:10260418 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989100:27730/25:10260418

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://ros.edu.pl/index.php?id=1498&lang=en" target="_blank" >https://ros.edu.pl/index.php?id=1498&lang=en</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.54740/ros.2025.007" target="_blank" >10.54740/ros.2025.007</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparative Analysis of the Use of Renewable Energy Sources in Selected Single-family Houses

  • Original language description

    Renewable energy sources play a substantial role in producing electricity and heat in single-family homes while becoming independent from external energy suppliers. This is primarily due to economic advantages, i.e., reducing electricity costs. This article aims to compare two single-family homes powered by photovoltaic systems and, additionally, a heat pump. Both buildings were located near each other in the same climate conditions (Swietokrzyskie Province, Poland). The analysis compared electricity production from the photovoltaic systems for two different module models with a maximum power of 280 W and 340 W for both buildings. Additionally, an analysis of electricity production was carried out for the monthly installation operation in the summer and autumn periods. The monthly electricity consumption from the heat pump in the autumn and winter periods was presented. In the last step, an economic analysis of the return on investment for both installations was presented. It turned out that despite the difference in investment costs, the payback period for both buildings is between 6-7 years. © 2025. Author(s).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20100 - Civil engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    O - Projekt operacniho programu

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Rocznik Ochrony Środowiska

  • ISSN

    1506-218X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    27

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    _

  • Country of publishing house

    PL - POLAND

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    70-81

  • UT code for WoS article

    001429073500005

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85219142473