Dva omyly Bělohradovy kritiky a ještě jedna nepřesnost

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F03%3A00009216" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/03:00009216 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Dva omyly Bělohradovy kritiky a ještě jedna nepřesnost

Original language description

In his paper 'Do actual entities exhaust all possible objects?'(ORGANON F IX, 4, 359-384) Belohrad tries to find some inconsistencies in transparent intensional logic (TIL), concerning, in particular, the concept of existence. It is shown that this attempt is marred by two major errors that stem in Belohrad's mixing up a) existence in the sense of TIL with "existence" applicable to particulars, and b) individual offices with individuals themselves. Besides, in Belohrad's argumentation there is an inaccuracy concerning mixing up the contingent assignment of meaning to an expression and the status of an object beyond the language, which is being assigned to an expression.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_x - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

CEP classification

AA - Philosophy and religion

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

<a href="/en/project/GA401%2F03%2F1403" target="_blank" >GA401/03/1403: Principles of Logical Analysis of Language Expressions and Intensional Logic</a><br>

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year

2003

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Organon F

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

10

Issue of the periodical within the volume

10

Country of publishing house

SK - SLOVAKIA

Number of pages

5

Pages from-to

81-85

UT code for WoS article

—

EID of the result in the Scopus database

—