All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Different approaches for face authentication as part of a multimodal biometrics system

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F18%3A10238881" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/18:10238881 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://advances.utc.sk/index.php/AEEE/article/view/2547" target="_blank" >http://advances.utc.sk/index.php/AEEE/article/view/2547</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15598/aeee.v16i1.2547" target="_blank" >10.15598/aeee.v16i1.2547</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Different approaches for face authentication as part of a multimodal biometrics system

  • Original language description

    This paper describes different approaches for the face authentication from the features and classification abilities point of view. Authors compare two types of features - Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) and Local Binary Patterns (LBP) including their combination. These parameters are classified using Multilayer Neural Network (MLNN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). Face authentication consists of several steps. The first step contains Viola-Jones algorithm for face detection. Authors resize the detected face for a fixed vector and afterwards, it is converted into grayscale. Next, feature extraction with a simple Min-Max normalization is applied. Obtained parameters are evaluated by classifiers and for each detected face, authors get posterior probability as the output of the classifier. Different approaches for face authentication are compared with each other using False Acceptance Rate (FAR), False Rejection Rate (FRR), Equal Error Rate (EER), Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Detection Error Tradeoff (DET) curves. The results are verified with AR Face Database and elaborated in a feature extraction and classifier design point of view. Best results were achieved by HOG feature for SVM classifier. Detailed results are listed in the text below. (C) 2018 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  • ISSN

    1336-1376

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    16

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    118-124

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85044927159