A Comparison Between the Quality of Two Level and Three Levels Bidirectional Buck-Boost Converter Using the Neural Network Controller

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F24%3A10255352" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/24:10255352 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61989100:27730/24:10255352
Result on the web
<a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10535512" target="_blank" >https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10535512</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3403769" target="_blank" >10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3403769</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A Comparison Between the Quality of Two Level and Three Levels Bidirectional Buck-Boost Converter Using the Neural Network Controller
Original language description
A comparison between two-phase and three-phase interlaced DC converter with parallel MOSFET is presented. PWM is evaluated using a two-way DC-DC converter to charge and discharge a battery. The results show an excellent DC voltage gain without an extremely high cycle load. The interlaced DC-DC converters with MOSFETs in parallel in two and three phases offer distinct advantages and limitations. The two-phase converter has a simpler design and a potentially lower cost due to the reduced number of components. However, it can present challenges in terms of precise voltage regulation and current balancing, due to the limited number of switching phases. On the other hand, the three-phase converter offers more precise voltage regulation and improved current balance thanks to its higher number of phases. While this results in increased design complexity and potentially higher cost, it allows for a more uniform distribution of current load among MOSFETs. The choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements of the application, acceptable trade-offs in terms of complexity, cost and performance, as well as the need for accurate voltage regulation and optimal current balancing.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20200 - Electrical engineering, Electronic engineering, Information engineering

Project
<a href="/en/project/TN02000025" target="_blank" >TN02000025: National Centre for Energy II</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)