Comparison of approaches to gauge repeatability and reproducibility analysis

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27360%2F18%3A10241049" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27360/18:10241049 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2018/42/matecconf_qpi2018_03015.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2018/42/matecconf_qpi2018_03015.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818303015" target="_blank" >10.1051/matecconf/201818303015</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of approaches to gauge repeatability and reproducibility analysis
Original language description
The paper presents approaches to Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility (GRR) analysis. The aim of the paper is to compare three methods of GRR analysis - A&R method, ANOVA and EMP III. The first part gives insight to use of Measurement System Analysis (MSA) since properly planned and executed measurement systems can provide a good basis for decision making in companies. One of the new approaches will be presented that is different from the others described by AIAG or VDA guide. Compared to known A&R method and ANOVA, EMP III interpret the results in more detail. Beyond the information about variability of measurement process, the approach provides other useful parameters as attenuation of process signals, change of detecting error shift and an ability to track process improvements. Wider use of the results is illustrated by an example of measuring the dimensions of fasteners. (C) The Authors.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)