All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Critical evaluation of quantitative determination of minerals in slags by a new MCQMA and QXRD methods

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27360%2F22%3A10250801" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27360/22:10250801 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989100:27350/22:10250801

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-02069-6" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-02069-6</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-02069-6" target="_blank" >10.1617/s11527-022-02069-6</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Critical evaluation of quantitative determination of minerals in slags by a new MCQMA and QXRD methods

  • Original language description

    A new modified chemical quantitative mineral analysis (MCQMA) method was developed and used for quantitative calculation of crystalline and amorphous phases in ladle and blast furnace slags and their slag blends with 20-100 wt% of the amorphous phase. MCQMA calculation was created by combination of the original chemical quantitative mineral analysis (CQMA) with bulk chemical analysis (XRF) and QXRD-Rietveld method with an internal standard (QXRD*). These X-ray diffraction data were used for a) identification of crystalline minerals and for the support of calculation of average oxide formula of amorphous phase for MCQMA calculation and b) for independent separated quantitative determination of crystalline (C12A7, C3A, C2S, C3S, MgO) and amorphous minerals and their comparison with data calculated by MCQMA. The advantage of the MCQMA consists also in the possibility to test separately the quality of determined phase percentages provided by MCQMA and QXRD* methods using their feedback conversion on recalculated chemical analysis and compared them with bulk chemical analysis. For the tested data, the comparison showed that both methods provided comparable results. (C) 2022, The Author(s).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10406 - Analytical chemistry

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF17_049%2F0008426" target="_blank" >EF17_049/0008426: Research on the management of waste, materials and other products of metallurgy and related sectors</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions

  • ISSN

    1359-5997

  • e-ISSN

    1871-6873

  • Volume of the periodical

    55

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    10

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    nestrankovano

  • UT code for WoS article

    000890297500002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85143048796