All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Fully Plastic Failure Stresses and Allowable Crack Sizes for Circumferentially Surface-Cracked Pipes Subjected to Tensile Loading

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27690%2F22%3A10250512" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27690/22:10250512 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000735947600007" target="_blank" >https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000735947600007</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4050321" target="_blank" >10.1115/1.4050321</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Fully Plastic Failure Stresses and Allowable Crack Sizes for Circumferentially Surface-Cracked Pipes Subjected to Tensile Loading

  • Original language description

    Fully plastic failure stresses for circumferentially surface-cracked pipes subjected to tensile loading can be estimated by means of limit load criteria based on the net-section stress approach. Limit load criteria of the first type (labeled LLC-1) were derived from the balance of uniaxial forces. Limit load criteria of the second type are given in Section XI of the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineering) Code, and were derived from the balance of bending moment and axial force. These are labeled LLC-2. Fully plastic failure stresses estimated by using LLC-1 and LLC-2 were compared. The stresses estimated by LLC-1 are always larger than those estimated by LLC-2. From the literature survey of experimental data, failure stresses obtained by both types of LLC were compared with the experimental data. It can be stated that failure stresses calculated by LLC-1 are better than those calculated by LLC-2 for shallow cracks. On the contrary, for deep cracks, LLC-2 predictions of failure stresses are fairly close to the experimental data. Furthermore, allowable circumferential crack sizes obtained by LLC-1 were compared with the sizes given in Section XI of the ASME Code. The allowable crack sizes obtained by LLC-1 are larger than those obtained by LLC-2. It can be stated that the allowable crack size for tensile stress depends on the condition of constraint of the pipe, and the allowable cracks given in Section XI of the ASME Code are conservative. (C) 2021 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20501 - Materials engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF17_048%2F0007373" target="_blank" >EF17_048/0007373: Damage Prediction of Structural Materials</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME

  • ISSN

    0094-9930

  • e-ISSN

    1528-8978

  • Volume of the periodical

    144

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    nestrankovano

  • UT code for WoS article

    000735947600007

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85112649264