All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Choosing the Optimal Multi-Point Iterative Method for the Colebrook Flow Friction Equation

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27740%2F18%3A10240156" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27740/18:10240156 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/6/8/130" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/6/8/130</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr6080130" target="_blank" >10.3390/pr6080130</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Choosing the Optimal Multi-Point Iterative Method for the Colebrook Flow Friction Equation

  • Original language description

    The Colebrook equation is implicitly given in respect to the unknown flow friction factor lambda; lambda = zeta(Re, epsilon*, lambda) which cannot be expressed explicitly in exact way without simplifications and use of approximate calculus. A common approach to solve it is through the Newton-Raphson iterative procedure or through the fixed-point iterative procedure. Both require in some cases, up to seven iterations. On the other hand, numerous more powerful iterative methods such as three-or two-point methods, etc. are available. The purpose is to choose optimal iterative method in order to solve the implicit Colebrook equation for flow friction accurately using the least possible number of iterations. The methods are thoroughly tested and those which require the least possible number of iterations to reach the accurate solution are identified. The most powerful three-point methods require, in the worst case, only two iterations to reach the final solution. The recommended representatives are Sharma-Guha-Gupta, Sharma-Sharma, Sharma-Arora, Dzunic-Petkovic-Petkovic; Bi-Ren-Wu, Chun-Neta based on Kung-Traub, Neta, and the Jain method based on the Steffensen scheme. The recommended iterative methods can reach the final accurate solution with the least possible number of iterations. The approach is hybrid between the iterative procedure and one-step explicit approximations and can be used in engineering design for initial rough, but also for final fine calculations.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10103 - Statistics and probability

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Processes

  • ISSN

    2227-9717

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    6

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    17

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    000443615900034

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85051805790