All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F11%3A10223275" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/11:10223275 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2011.044" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2011.044</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2011.044" target="_blank" >10.5507/bp.2011.044</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction

  • Original language description

    EUS performed prior to ERCP or surgery in patients with a low to moderate probability of choledocholithiasis. This study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of EUS and TUS compared to ERCP in a cohort of 100 patients. The sensitivity andaccuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of common bile duct dilatation were 84% and 83%, i.e. significantly higher (p=0.0001) than TUS (46% and 66%, ). The specificities (82%, 91%) were not significantly different (p=0.218). The sensitivity and accuracy of EUSin the diagnosis of pathological content of the common bile duct were 88% and 92%, i.e. significantly higher (p{0.0001) than TUS (33% and 64%). The specificities (96%, 94%) were not significantly different (p=0.641). The incidence of choledocholithiasisin the high-risk group was significantly higher than in the moderate-risk group (p=0.012). EUS is a method with high sensitivity, specificity. It should therefore be preferred to ERCP in patients with low or moderate risk of choledocholit

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FE - Other fields of internal medicine

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/NT11023" target="_blank" >NT11023: PET / CT and ultrastructural changes of mitochondria as predictive factors for pancreatic cancer</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2011

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Biomedical Papers-Olomouc

  • ISSN

    1213-8118

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    155

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    225-232

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database