Comparison between femoropopliteal bypass and subintimal recanalization in patients with intermittent claudication

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F13%3A33143899" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/13:33143899 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00098892:_____/13:#0000434

Result on the web

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Comparison between femoropopliteal bypass and subintimal recanalization in patients with intermittent claudication

Original language description

Revascularization in patients with intermittent claudication and long occlusions in the femoral region classified as TASC category C-D is classically performed by femoropopliteal bypass (FPB). An endovascular alternative is represented by subintimal recanalization (SIR). The aim of our work is to compare long-term results of FPB and SIR in patients with solely claudication. Methods: Between January 2002 and December 2010, 196 patients with intermittent claudication with comparable SFA occlusion were indicated for revascularization. Two comparable groups of patients were created randomly.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_x - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

CEP classification

FJ - Surgery including transplantology

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2013

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

ISSN

1824-4777

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

20

Issue of the periodical within the volume

2

Country of publishing house

IT - ITALY

Number of pages

7

Pages from-to

97-103

UT code for WoS article

—

EID of the result in the Scopus database

—