Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F16%3A33162120" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/16:33162120 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub2" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub2" target="_blank" >10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub2</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.

Original language description

Background Cleft lip and palate is one of the most common birth defects and can cause difficulties with feeding, speech and hearing, as well as psychosocial problems. Treatment of orofacial clefts is prolonged; it typically commences after birth and lasts until the child reaches adulthood or even into adulthood. Residual deformities, functional disturbances, or both, are frequently seen in adults with a repaired cleft. Conventional orthognathic surgery, such as Le Fort I osteotomy, is often performed for the correction of maxillary hypoplasia. An alternative intervention is distraction osteogenesis, which achieves bone lengthening by gradual mechanical distraction. Objectives To provide evidence regarding the effects and long-term results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis compared to orthognathic surgery for the treatment of hypoplastic maxilla in people with cleft lip and palate. Search methods We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 16 February 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, 2016, Issue 1), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 16 February 2016), Embase Ovid (1980 to 16 February 2016), LILACS BIREME (1982 to 16 February 2016), the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov) (to 16 February 2016), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (to 16 February 2016). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication in the electronic searches. We performed handsearching of six speciality journals and we checked the reference lists of all trials identified for further studies. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maxillary distraction osteogenesis to conventional Le Fort I osteotomy for the correction of cleft lip and palate maxillary hypoplasia in non-syndromic cleft patients aged 15 years or older.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_x - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

CEP classification

FF - ENT (ie. ear, nose, throat), ophthalmology, dentistry

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2016

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016

ISSN

1469-493X

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

2016

Issue of the periodical within the volume

9

Country of publishing house

GB - UNITED KINGDOM

Number of pages

39

Pages from-to

" CD010403-1"-" CD010403-39"

UT code for WoS article

000389599000009

EID of the result in the Scopus database

—