Surgical revision vs. stent-graft to treat venous anastomosis stenosis following surgical thrombectomy of hemodialysis grafts
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F18%3A73587440" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/18:73587440 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.18.03933-0" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.18.03933-0</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.18.03933-0" target="_blank" >10.23736/S0392-9590.18.03933-0</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Surgical revision vs. stent-graft to treat venous anastomosis stenosis following surgical thrombectomy of hemodialysis grafts
Original language description
BACKGROUND: There is no unanimous strategy for treating stenosis of the venous anastomosis (VA) of an occluded arteriovenous graft (AVG) following surgical thrombectomy. In this study, we compared classical surgical treatment and endovascular treatment procedures with the use of stent- graft in a single center study. The aim was to evaluate whether, the VA stenosis of thrombosed AVG treated endovascularly by stent-graft implantation, have as good results as surgical VA treatment, so that it may be considered the method of choice. METHODS: The study included patients who underwent surgical AVG thrombectomy with subsequent angiographically confirmed VA stenosis between 1/2009 and 12/2014. Surgical angioplasty was then performed in 15 patients and 17 patients underwent primary stent-graft implantation. RESULTS: In the surgically treated patients, the postintervention primary patency, primary assisted patency and secondary patency after 12 months were 50.7%, 56.3%, 62.4%, respectively. In the group of patients with occluded AVG who underwent stent-graft implantation, the postintervention primary patency, primary assisted patency and secondary patency after 12 months were 32.8%, 44.1% a 55.6%, respectively. No statistically significant difference in primary patency (P=0.391), primary assisted patency (P=0.605), and secondary patency (P=0.702) was observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Stent-graft implantation into stenotic VA of an occluded AVG showed to be effective and maintained good long-term patency. It is the preferred method due to its minimal invasiveness. The superiority of this method must be confirmed on a larger set of patients.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30212 - Surgery
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Angiology
ISSN
0392-9590
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
37
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
IT - ITALY
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
315-321
UT code for WoS article
000445302300009
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85049392525