Randomized Phase II Study of Paclitaxel plus Alisertib versus Paclitaxel plus Placebo as Second-Line Therapy for SCLC: Primary and Correlative Biomarker Analyses.

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F20%3A73600692" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/20:73600692 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00843989:_____/20:E0108444

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.jto.org/article/S1556-0864(19)33572-5/pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.jto.org/article/S1556-0864(19)33572-5/pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.10.013" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jtho.2019.10.013</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Randomized Phase II Study of Paclitaxel plus Alisertib versus Paclitaxel plus Placebo as Second-Line Therapy for SCLC: Primary and Correlative Biomarker Analyses.

Original language description

Introduction: We assessed the Aurora A kinase inhibitor, alisertib, plus paclitaxel (henceforth referred to as alisertib/paclitaxel) as second-line treatment for SCLC. Methods: In this double-blind study, patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC were stratified by relapse type (sensitive versus resistant or refractory) and brain metastases and randomized 1:1 to alisertib/paclitaxel or placebo plus paclitaxel (henceforth referred to as placebo/paclitaxel) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Associations of c-Myc expression in tumor tissue (prespecified) and genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (retrospective) with clinical outcome were evaluated. Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled (89 in each arm). The median PFS was 3.32 months with alisertib/paclitaxel versus 2.17 months with placebo/paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR] ¼ 0.77, 95% confidence limit [CI]: 0.557–1.067, p ¼ 0.113 in the intent-to-treat population versus HR ¼ 0.71, 95% CI: 0.509–0.985, p ¼ 0.038 with corrected analysis applied). Among 140 patients with genetic alternations, patients with cell cycle regulator mutations (cyclindependent kinase 6 gene [CDK6], retinoblastoma-like 1 gene [RBL1], retinoblastoma-like 2 gene [RBL2], and retinoblastoma 1 gene [RB1]) had significantly improved PFS with alisertib/paclitaxel versus with placebo/paclitaxel (3.68 versus 1.80 months, respectively [HR ¼ 0.395, 95% CI: 0.239–0.654, p ¼ 0.0003]), and overall survival (7.20 versus 4.47 months, respectively [HR ¼ 0.427, 95% CI: 0.259–0.704, p ¼ 0.00085]). A subset of patients with c-Myc expression showed significantly improved PFS with alisertib/paclitaxel. The incidence of grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events was 67% (58 patients) with alisertib/paclitaxel versus 22% (25 patients) with placebo/paclitaxel. Twelve patients (14%) versus 11 (12%) died on study, including four versus zero treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Efficacy signals were seen with alisertib/paclitaxel in relapsed or refractory SCLC. c-Myc expression and mutations in cell cycle regulators may be potential predictive biomarkers of alisertib efficacy; further prospective validations are warranted.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30203 - Respiratory systems

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2020

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Journal of Thoracic Oncology

ISSN

1556-0864

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

15

Issue of the periodical within the volume

2

Country of publishing house

US - UNITED STATES

Number of pages

14

Pages from-to

274-287

UT code for WoS article

000509465700019

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85076252407