Exploring Nursing Students' Perspectives on Patient Safety Culture in Clinical Settings: A Mixed-Method Study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15120%2F25%3A73630779" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15120/25:73630779 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17812" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17812</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17812" target="_blank" >10.1111/jocn.17812</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Exploring Nursing Students' Perspectives on Patient Safety Culture in Clinical Settings: A Mixed-Method Study
Original language description
Background: Patient safety in undergraduate nursing studies is an indispensable component of the curriculum. The process ofexperiential learning from practice is of high value not only in terms of personal development but also enables students to identifyand address critical areas of patient safety that require improvement.Aim: To explore Czech undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of patient safety culture during clinical practice through amixed-method sequential study.Methods: Data were collected between 2021 and 2024 using a mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase utilised the hos-pital survey on patient safety culture for nursing students. Four hundred and eighty-two undergraduate nursing students from16 faculties across the Czech Republic participated. The subsequent qualitative phase employed semi-structured interviews with12 undergraduate nursing students from one faculty in the Czech Republic. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods wereused to analyse quantitative results, complemented by a reflective thematic analysis of qualitative data.Results: The most negatively rated survey dimensions were ‘Frequency of events reported’ (37.0%) and ‘Nonpunitive responsesto errors’ (42.4%). Predictors for reporting adverse events in clinical practice were ‘Indicators of good practice’ (p ≤ 0.05). Basedon the quantitative phase, the interpretive journey of nursing students' experiences from Exposure to adverse events, throughFeeling disconnected and Cognitive dissonance, to the necessity of Speaking up for patient safety culture was captured in thequalitative phase.Conclusions: Nursing students struggle to engage in a patient safety culture, particularly in reporting adverse events duringclinical practice. Strengthening education on reporting and standards is essential for students, along with professional develop-ment for clinical staff to align practices and cultures.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30307 - Nursing
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
ISSN
0962-1067
e-ISSN
1365-2702
Volume of the periodical
34
Issue of the periodical within the volume
7
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
2702-2717
UT code for WoS article
001483204200001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105004347642