The evolution of differential object marking in Alor-Pantar languages
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F18%3A73588340" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/18:73588340 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://langsci-press.org/catalog/view/173/873/1044-1" target="_blank" >http://langsci-press.org/catalog/view/173/873/1044-1</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1228247" target="_blank" >10.5281/zenodo.1228247</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The evolution of differential object marking in Alor-Pantar languages
Original language description
This paper investigates the evolution of Differential Object Marking (DOM) in Abui and Teiwa, two Papuan languages of the Alor-Pantar family in Eastern Indonesia. In both languages, reflexes of the same proto-morpheme are used in the differential marking of P (the non-agentive argument in transitive constructions), but the languages contrast in the way Ps are differentiated. We compare the synchronic DOM patterns of Abui and Teiwa with each other as well as with the DOM patterns we reconstruct for their shared ancestor. We establish how different patterns of DOM in this family have evolved over time, and which semantic and morphological changes occurred in the process. In their morphological expression, there are two strategies by which P’s are differentiated: (i) the asymmetrical strategy involves an opposition between P as either a verbal prefix or a free nominal, and (ii) the symmetrical strategy where the choice of a P-prefix is variable depending on the semantics of P. Both strategies are used in both Teiwa and Abui, but the symmetrical strategy involves a choice between two different prefixes in Teiwa and five different prefixes in Abui. Different factors trigger DOM in both languages: in Teiwa it is mostly based on the inherent properties (animacy) of P, while in Abui there are many other triggers besides the animacy of P, including the affectedness relation between the action and the P referent and the inflectional class of the verb. Furthermore, Abui has developed an extra, third, formal strategy to differentiate human Ps from non-human ones in a serial verb construction. The alignment system we reconstruct for the proto-language was semantic. It evolved into an accusative alignment system in Teiwa, but was retained and further complexified in Abui. Alignment systems are not static: their forms and triggers may be modified and complexified over time.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
C - Chapter in a specialist book
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60203 - Linguistics
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Book/collection name
Diachrony of differential argument marking
ISBN
978-3-96110-086-6
Number of pages of the result
27
Pages from-to
"69–95"
Number of pages of the book
553
Publisher name
Language Science Press
Place of publication
Berlin
UT code for WoS chapter
—