All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative and the South China Sea Dispute on the Hedging Strategies of the Philippines and Vietnam Towards China

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F22%3A73621240" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/22:73621240 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.aup-online.com/content/papers/10.5117/9789048557820/ICAS.2022.023" target="_blank" >https://www.aup-online.com/content/papers/10.5117/9789048557820/ICAS.2022.023</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789048557820/ICAS.2022.023" target="_blank" >10.5117/9789048557820/ICAS.2022.023</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative and the South China Sea Dispute on the Hedging Strategies of the Philippines and Vietnam Towards China

  • Original language description

    Hedging is an attractive strategy for governments, especially in Southeast Asia, as well as a popular academic lens for analyzing the foreign policy strategies of small and middle powers. The Philippines and Vietnam are among the countries which apply a hedging strategy towards the rising China. Both countries seek gains from their close political-diplomatic and economic engagement with Beijing, conducted both bilaterally and multilaterally via the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. At the same time, they follow omnidirectional political-diplomatic, economic and security relations to insure themselves from negative impacts stemming from their relations with China. Despite these fundamental similarities, the hedging strategies of the Philippines and Vietnam also vary considerably: Hanoi’s hedging strategy has been in the last decade very consistent and much more robust due to strong China-critical perceptions of the leadership, whereas Manila responded under the initially China-friendly President Duterte in a less planned, more ad hoc manner to Beijing’s policies and actions. Since mid-2019, though, the Philippines apply more confrontational measures towards China. This was a reaction to the lower than expected returns from the collaboration under the frame of the Belt and Road Initiative and China’s assertive behaviour in the South China Sea. However, neither the more confrontational Vietnamese policies nor the initially more cooperative Philippine policies resulted in an improvement of the security in the South China Sea.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    O - Projekt operacniho programu

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    The Twelfth International Convention of Asia Scholars (ICAS 12)

  • ISBN

    978-90-485-5782-0

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    191-198

  • Publisher name

    Amsterdam University Press

  • Place of publication

    Amsterdam

  • Event location

    Kyoto

  • Event date

    Aug 24, 2021

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000865764900023