The dialogue between judges leading to a consensus? On a mute and a silent dialogue before ECtHR

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F17%3A73586050" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/17:73586050 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The dialogue between judges leading to a consensus? On a mute and a silent dialogue before ECtHR
Original language description
The article discusses two specific procedural issues before the European Court of Human Rights: namely the interpretative technique of European consensus and the issues of advisory opinions which are supposed to be formulated by national highest courts of Council of Europe´s member states. Both procedural issues enhance a kind of dialogue between judges. Meanwhile the European consensus, which is discussed, formulated, established and used in the premises of the ECtHR, forms a “mute dialogue” where judges tackle societal changes supported by different European municipal legislations or international instruments. The technique of advisory opinions which is foreseen by the Additional Protocol n°16 to the European Convention on Human Rights not yet entered into force, is however described as a silent dialogue, where national courts may directly address their concerns to the Court for a sort of preliminary non-binding question. This creates a sort of dialogue with specific issues to be solved.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Project
<a href="/en/project/GA15-03102S" target="_blank" >GA15-03102S: The Characteristics and the Role of European Consensus in the Interpretation of European Convention on Human Rights</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)