All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Application of the Doctrine of Res Judicata in the Context of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Analysis of the Court’s Decisions in the Gombert and Dexter Cases

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F21%3A73608999" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/21:73608999 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://apcz.umk.pl/CLR/article/view/34581/30864" target="_blank" >https://apcz.umk.pl/CLR/article/view/34581/30864</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2021.009" target="_blank" >10.12775/CLR.2021.009</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Application of the Doctrine of Res Judicata in the Context of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Analysis of the Court’s Decisions in the Gombert and Dexter Cases

  • Original language description

    As part of an ongoing discussion on the proliferation of the human rights judicial mechanism, this article critically analyses and unpacks the only two examples where the African Court had to decide on the application of the doctrine of res judicata under Article 56(7) of the African Charter. The Court declared both applications inadmissible on the grounds of their previous settlements by the ECOWAS Court of Justice and the United Nations Human Rights Committee. The article demonstrates that while the Court’s decision in the Gombert case appears to be correct in principle, its finding in the Dexter case is highly questionable and unconvincing.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Comparative Law Review

  • ISSN

    0866-9449

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2021

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    27

  • Country of publishing house

    PL - POLAND

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    235-254

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85122302607