The Person of the Arbitrator in Comparative Perspective of Czech and German Law
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F22%3A73617994" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/22:73617994 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://sciendo.com/issue/ICLR/22/2" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/issue/ICLR/22/2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2022-0022" target="_blank" >10.2478/iclr-2022-0022</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Person of the Arbitrator in Comparative Perspective of Czech and German Law
Original language description
In arbitration, it is the parties who, on the basis of various criteria – experience, references, expertise, previous meetings, etc. – can determine who will decide their dispute as an arbitrator. In this respect, arbitration differs fundamentally from proceedings before the ordinary courts in civil proceedings, where the judge is appointed on the basis of a work schedule and the parties to the dispute cannot change the judge so appointed by agreement. Nonetheless, despite the broad autonomy of the parties, the various legal systems lay down certain conditions which must be met by any person wishing to act as an arbitrator. This article takes a comparative view of these legal conditions to act as an arbitrator and seeks to highlight the differences in the conditions defined, the (in)appropriateness of certain conditions and the fact that a person who does not meet the conditions to act as an arbitrator under one legal system does not automatically mean that he cannot be an arbitrator under another legal system.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International and Comparative Law Review
ISSN
1213-8770
e-ISSN
2464-6601
Volume of the periodical
2022
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
18
Pages from-to
197-214
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85149563334