All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Audiovisual Recording as Evidence in Administrative Proceeding versus the Right to Privacy (from the Point of View of the Czech Republic)

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F24%3A73629868" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/24:73629868 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Audiovisual Recording as Evidence in Administrative Proceeding versus the Right to Privacy (from the Point of View of the Czech Republic)

  • Original language description

    With the development of modern communication and information technologies, Czech public administration bodies are increasingly encountering evidence of an audiovisual nature. Evidence by audiovisual recording is very common, especially in proceedings on administrative offenses, but also in other administrative proceedings. Relatively often in practice there is a situation where such audiovisual recordings (eg camera system recordings, recordings made on a mobile phone, etc.) are made without the consent of the persons concerned, and administrative authorities, or subsequently courts, are forced to assess their applicability in administrative proceedings and then in court proceedings. The basic problem is that such recordings may interfere with the right to privacy guaranteed in particular by Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms, resp similarly Article 7 of the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. The situation in the Czech Republic is all the more complicated because the performance of audiovisual recordings as evidence is not regulated at all in the Administrative Procedure Code. The subject of this chapter is therefore an analysis of how to resolve in practice this conflict between the right to privacy and the interest of the state and society to punish the perpetrators of the offense. Both the legal regulation and the practice of Czech administrative bodies and courts, as well as the case law of the ECtHR will be taken into account.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    The Right to Privacy

  • ISBN

    978-83-67149-40-2

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    19-30

  • Publisher name

    Wydawnictvo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości

  • Place of publication

    Varšava

  • Event location

    Varšava

  • Event date

    Jun 1, 2022

  • Type of event by nationality

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • UT code for WoS article