How well do predation rates on arteficial nests estimate predation on natural passering nests?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F01%3A00001813" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/01:00001813 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
How well do predation rates on arteficial nests estimate predation on natural passering nests?
Original language description
Daily survival rates of three nest types were compared among three passerine species: Yellowhammer, Blackcap and Song Thrush. This study suggests that artificial nests could not be used to assess survival of natural nests without careful validation of the experimental results.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
EG - Zoology
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA206%2F98%2FP119" target="_blank" >GA206/98/P119: Antipredation strategy of open nesting passerines</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2001
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Ibis
ISSN
0019-1019
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
143
Issue of the periodical within the volume
-
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
632-641
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—