Differences in visual programming for GIS

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F14%3A33149392" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/14:33149392 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.519-520.353" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.519-520.353</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.519-520.353" target="_blank" >10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.519-520.353</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Differences in visual programming for GIS
Original language description
ArcGIS and AutoCAD Map 3D are both geographic information system (GIS) software. Both are used worldwide in many countries and companies. The dataflow design in visual editors is suitable for daily work. Visual languages are valuable for wide user community. Dataflow design automatizes typical GIS tasks and makes the processes universal. It is possible to construct simple or complex workflows with a visual editor in both software. The concept of visual programming is highly acceptable for GIS users because they think spatially and graphically. The article presented practical example for automatic finding of suitable area for construction of new hotel. Two data flow diagrams for the same task demonstrate the differences between graphical notations in ArcGIS and AutoCAD Map.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Project
<a href="/en/project/EE2.3.20.0166" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0166: Science Education Center</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year
2014
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)