Redukce dimensionality v Booleovských datech: Porovnání čtyř metod
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F15%3A33156523" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/15:33156523 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-662-48577-4_8" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-662-48577-4_8</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48577-4_8" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-662-48577-4_8</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
čeština
Original language name
Dimensionality Reduction in Boolean Data: Comparison of Four BMF Methods
Original language description
We compare four methods for Boolean matrix factorization (BMF). The oldest of these methods is the 8M method implemented in the BMDP statistical software package developed in the 1960s. The three other methods were developed recently. All the methods compute from an input object-attribute matrix I two matrices, namely an object-factor matrix A and a factor-attribute matrix B in such a way that the Boolean matrix product of A and B is approximately equal to I. Such decompositions are utilized directly inBoolean factor analysis or indirectly as a dimensionality reduction method for Boolean data in machine learning. While some comparison of the BMF methods with matrix decomposition methods designed for real valued data exists in the literature, a mutualcomparison of the various BMF methods is a severely neglected topic. In this paper, we compare the four methods on real datasets. In particular, we observe the reconstruction ability of the first few computed factors as well as the number
Czech name
Dimensionality Reduction in Boolean Data: Comparison of Four BMF Methods
Czech description
We compare four methods for Boolean matrix factorization (BMF). The oldest of these methods is the 8M method implemented in the BMDP statistical software package developed in the 1960s. The three other methods were developed recently. All the methods compute from an input object-attribute matrix I two matrices, namely an object-factor matrix A and a factor-attribute matrix B in such a way that the Boolean matrix product of A and B is approximately equal to I. Such decompositions are utilized directly inBoolean factor analysis or indirectly as a dimensionality reduction method for Boolean data in machine learning. While some comparison of the BMF methods with matrix decomposition methods designed for real valued data exists in the literature, a mutualcomparison of the various BMF methods is a severely neglected topic. In this paper, we compare the four methods on real datasets. In particular, we observe the reconstruction ability of the first few computed factors as well as the number
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
IN - Informatics
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Clustering High--Dimensional Data, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, col. 7627
ISBN
—
ISSN
0302-9743
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
118-133
Publisher name
Springer - Verlag Italia
Place of publication
Milano
Event location
Naples; Italy
Event date
May 15, 2012
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—