Different collecting methods reveal different ecological groups of centipedes

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F15%3A33157138" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/15:33157138 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://www.scielo.br/pdf/zool/v32n5/1984-4689-zool-32-05-00345.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.scielo.br/pdf/zool/v32n5/1984-4689-zool-32-05-00345.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702015000500003" target="_blank" >10.1590/S1984-46702015000500003</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Different collecting methods reveal different ecological groups of centipedes
Original language description
Soil invertebrates are studied by a number of methods. Here we used zoological methods (soil sampling, pitfall trapping, litter sifting, and hand collecting) to sample centipede communities in four floodplain forests (Czech Republic, Europe) and compared the efficiency of these methods. Heat-extraction from soil samples was the most effective, followed by pitfall trapping. The centipedes found by us can be divided into five ecological groups: 1) larger, abundant lithobiomorphs, 2) larger, scarcer lithobiomorphs, 3) smaller, soil lithobiomorphs, 4) abundant geophilomorphs, and 5) scarcer geophilomorphs.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
EG - Zoology
OECD FORD branch
—

Project
<a href="/en/project/QJ1230066" target="_blank" >QJ1230066: Effect of soil degradation on complex soil properties including conservation measures for restoration soil agroecological function</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)