The Behavior of Amaranth, Chickpea, Millet, Corn, Quinoa, Buckwheat and Rice Doughs Under Shear Oscillatory and Uniaxial Elongational Tests Simulating Proving and Baking
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F16%3A33159503" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/16:33159503 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtxs.12176/epdf" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtxs.12176/epdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12176" target="_blank" >10.1111/jtxs.12176</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Behavior of Amaranth, Chickpea, Millet, Corn, Quinoa, Buckwheat and Rice Doughs Under Shear Oscillatory and Uniaxial Elongational Tests Simulating Proving and Baking
Original language description
Shear oscillatory and uniaxial elongational tests performed at 30C were used to simulate gluten-free dough proving; shear oscillatory temperature ramp (30- 90C) was used to simulate baking. In test simulating initial stages of proving the differences in wheat and gluten-free dough (amaranth, buckwheat, chickpea, corn, quinoa, millet and rice) behavior were most evident from the higher values of elastic (10^5 Pa) and viscous moduli (10^4 Pa) of gluten-free doughs compared with the values of elastic (10^4 Pa) and viscous moduli (10^3 Pa) of wheat dough. During later stages of proving, the region of elastic, time-dependent viscoelastic and viscous deformations of gluten-free doughs were very narrow, and moreover varied among the investigated gluten-free doughs. The stress required for dough rupture also differed among the tested gluten-free doughs. While rice, quinoa and millet dough ruptured under the stress of 10.6 kPa, 9.5 kPa and 9.2 kPa, respectively, significantly the lower stresses were required to rupture chickpea (4.9 kPa), amaranth (4.7 kPa), buckwheat (4.0 kPa) and corn (3.2 kPa) dough. Hencky strains at the moment of gluten-free doughs rupture were, however, quite similar (0.6-0.7). During oscillatory test simulating baking, complex viscosity of gluten-free doughs was up to 2-3 log cycles higher than the viscosity of wheat dough.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
GM - Food industry
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Texture Studies
ISSN
1745-4603
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
47
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
423-431
UT code for WoS article
000385410800005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—