All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

"Soft" consensus in decision-making model using partial goals method

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F16%3A33159926" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/16:33159926 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    "Soft" consensus in decision-making model using partial goals method

  • Original language description

    The paper deals with the method of reaching consensus in group decision-making under fuzziness proposed by Sukač et al. in 2015. This multi-expert (ME) multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model utilizes fuzzy evaluations of absolute type and stems from the partial-goals tree evaluation methodology introduced by Talašová in 2003. The fuzzy evaluations of alternatives are in the form of fuzzy numbers on a universe representing the degree of fulfillment of a given goal and as such they express the fuzzy degrees of fulfillment of the given goal by the respective alternatives for each expert. Each expert is assigned a decision competence expressed by a fuzzy number. The group aggregation of expert evaluations is based on the idea of the 'soft' consensus introduced by Kacprzyk and Fedrizzi in 1986. The alternatives which are evaluated "good enough" by a "sufficient amount" of "important" experts are identified and those alternatives formthe set of possible solutions. In this paper we briefly recall the steps of the multi-expert 'soft' consensus reaching method by Sukač et al. and discuss its performance on practical examples in comparison with one of the most commonly used ME-MCDM approaches based on the weighted average of expert fuzzy evaluations. The center of gravity based ordering is applied to select the best evaluated alternative in this case. This way the paper analyzes the performance of the 'soft' consensus based MCDM method in the context of a well known benchmark and points out the added value of the 'soft' consensus based MCDM model.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

    BB - Applied statistics, operational research

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics MME 2016

  • ISBN

    978-80-7494-296-9

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    791-796

  • Publisher name

    Technical University of Liberec

  • Place of publication

    Liberec

  • Event location

    Liberec

  • Event date

    Sep 6, 2016

  • Type of event by nationality

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • UT code for WoS article