All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Are East African countries sustainable? Comparative analysis of two composite indicators

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F16%3A33160932" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/16:33160932 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30432-8_9" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30432-8_9</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30432-8_9" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-30432-8_9</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Are East African countries sustainable? Comparative analysis of two composite indicators

  • Original language description

    This chapter assesses the extent to which the development of five East African countries is sustainable. It starts with an overview of the concepts and measurement of sustainability, focusing on composite indicators. The main part of the chapter presents an analysis of two composite indicators (Adjusted Net Savings and Ecological Footprint) as applied to five East African countries (Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda). For each of the two indicators, we provide a short overview of the concept, a critique and an analysis of the results and policy implications. The results show that only one of the countries is unsustainable in Adjusted Net Savings, while the Ecological Footprint shows either all five countries as sustainable or all five as unsustainable, depending on the interpretation of bio-capacity. Since the indicators lead to different conclusions on countries' sustainabilty, we analyse the implications and discuss to what extent these indicators can be used for assesing country sustainability.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

    AH - Economics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Economic integration, currency union, and sustainable and inclusive growth in East Africa

  • ISBN

    978-3-319-30431-1

  • Number of pages of the result

    20

  • Pages from-to

    151-170

  • Number of pages of the book

    232

  • Publisher name

    Springer Iinternational Publishing

  • Place of publication

    Heidelberg

  • UT code for WoS chapter