Do the visual complexity algorithms match the generalization process in geographical displays?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F16%3A33161849" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/16:33161849 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B2/375/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B2-375-2016.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B2/375/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B2-375-2016.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B2-375-2016" target="_blank" >10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B2-375-2016</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Do the visual complexity algorithms match the generalization process in geographical displays?
Original language description
In this study, we first develop a hypothesis that existing quantitative visual complexity measures will overall reflect the level of cartographic generalization, and test this hypothesis. Specifically, to test our hypothesis, we first selected common geovisualization types (i.e., cartographic maps, hybrid maps, satellite images and shaded relief maps) and retrieved examples as provided by Google Maps, OpenStreetMap and SchweizMobil by swisstopo. Selected geovisualizations vary in cartographic design choices, scene contents and different levels of generalization. Following this, we applied one of Rosenholtz et al.'s (2007) visual clutter algorithms to obtain quantitative visual complexity scores for screenshots of the selected maps. We hypothesized that visual complexity should be constant across generalization levels, however, the algorithm suggested that the complexity of small-scale displays (less detailed) is higher than those of large-scale (high detail). We also observed vast differences in visual complexity among maps providers, which we attribute to their varying approaches towards the cartographic design and generalization process. Our efforts will contribute towards creating recommendations as to how the visual complexity algorithms could be optimized for cartographic products, and eventually be utilized as a part of the cartographic design process to assess the visual complexity.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
DE - Earth magnetism, geodesy, geography
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science
ISBN
—
ISSN
1682-1750
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
375-378
Publisher name
Copernicus GmbH
Place of publication
Göttingen
Event location
Praha
Event date
Jul 12, 2016
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—