Between Consultation and Collaboration: Self-Reported Objectives for 25 Web-Based Geoparticipation Projects in Urban Planning
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F21%3A73608774" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/21:73608774 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/11/783/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/11/783/htm</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10110783" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijgi10110783</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Between Consultation and Collaboration: Self-Reported Objectives for 25 Web-Based Geoparticipation Projects in Urban Planning
Original language description
Web-based participatory mapping technologies are being increasingly harnessed by local governments to crowdsource local knowledge and engage the public in urban planning policies as a means of increasing the transparency and legitimacy of planning processes and decisions. We refer to these technologies as "geoparticipation ". Current innovations are outpacing research into the use of geoparticipation in participatory planning practices. To address this knowledge gap, this paper investigates the objectives of web-based geoparticipation and uses empirical evidence from online survey responses related to 25 urban planning projects in nine countries across three continents (Europe, North America, and Australia). The survey adopts the objectives of the Spectrum for Public Participation that range from information empowerment, with each category specifying promises about how public input is expected to influence decision-making (IAP2, 2018). Our findings show that geoparticipation can leverage a 'middle-ground' of citizen participation by facilitating involvement alongside consultation and/or collaboration. This paper constitutes a pilot study as a step toward more robust and replicable empirical studies for cross-country comparisons. Empowerment (or citizen control) is not yet a normative goal or outcome for web-based geoparticipation. Our evidence also suggests that information is pursued alongside other objectives for citizen participation, and therefore functions not as a "low-hanging fruit " as portrayed in the literature, but rather as a core component of higher intensities of participation.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50702 - Urban studies (planning and development)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA19-14506S" target="_blank" >GA19-14506S: Geoparticipatory spatial tools in the decision making processes of local administrations</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
ISSN
2220-9964
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
10
Issue of the periodical within the volume
11
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
19
Pages from-to
"783-1"-"783-19"
UT code for WoS article
000723363500001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85119674309