A synthesis of multi-taxa management experiments to guide forest biodiversity conservation in Europe
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F23%3A73622187" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/23:73622187 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/60077344:_____/23:00573596 RIV/67985939:_____/23:00573596 RIV/60076658:12310/23:43906469 RIV/61989592:15310/23:73620469
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989423001889" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989423001889</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02553" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02553</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A synthesis of multi-taxa management experiments to guide forest biodiversity conservation in Europe
Original language description
Most European forests are used for timber production. Given the limited extent of unmanaged (and especially primary) forests, it is essential to include commercial forests in the conservation of forest biodiversity. In order to develop ecologically sustainable forest management practices, it is important to understand the management impacts on forest-dwelling organisms. Experiments allow testing the effects of alternative management strategies, and monitoring of multiple taxa informs us on the response range across forest-dwelling organisms. To provide a representative picture of the currently available information, metadata on 28 multi-taxa forest management experiments were collected from 14 European countries. We demonstrate the potential of compiling these experiments in a single network to upscale results from the local to continental level and indicate directions for future research. Among the different forest types, temperate deciduous beech and oak-dominated forests are the best represented in the multi-taxa management experiments. Of all the experimental treatments, innovative ways of traditional management techniques (e.g., gap cutting and thinning) and conservation-oriented interventions (e.g., microhabitat enrichment) provide the best opportunity for large-scale analyses. Regarding the organism groups, woody regeneration, herbs, fungi, beetles, bryophytes, birds and lichens offer the largest potential for addressing management-biodiversity relationships at the European level. We identified knowledge gaps regarding boreal, hemiboreal and broadleaved evergreen forests, the treatments of large herbivore exclusion, prescribed burning and forest floor or water manipulations, and the monitoring of soil-dwelling organisms and some vertebrate classes, e.g., amphibians, reptiles and mammals. To improve multi-site comparisons, design of future experiments should be fitted to the set-up of the ongoing projects and standardised biodiversity sampling is suggested. However, the network described here opens the way to learn lessons on the impact on forest biodiversity of different management techniques at the continental level, and thus, supports biodiversity conservation in managed forests.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10618 - Ecology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Global Ecology and Conservation
ISSN
2351-9894
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
46
Issue of the periodical within the volume
OCT
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
18
Pages from-to
"e02553-1"-"e02553-18"
UT code for WoS article
001040680700001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85164704725