All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

What to Choose for Estimating Leaf Water Status—Spectral Reflectance or In vivo Chlorophyll Fluorescence?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F24%3A73626406" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/24:73626406 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989592:15640/24:73626406

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://spj.science.org/doi/epdf/10.34133/plantphenomics.0243" target="_blank" >https://spj.science.org/doi/epdf/10.34133/plantphenomics.0243</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0243" target="_blank" >10.34133/plantphenomics.0243</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    What to Choose for Estimating Leaf Water Status—Spectral Reflectance or In vivo Chlorophyll Fluorescence?

  • Original language description

    In the context of global climate change and the increasing need to study plant response to drought, there is a demand for easily, rapidly, and remotely measurable parameters that sensitively reflect leaf water status. Parameters with this potential include those derived from leaf spectral reflectance (R) and chlorophyll fluorescence. As each of these methods probes completely different leaf characteristics, their sensitivity to water loss may differ in different plant species and/or under different circumstances, making it difficult to choose the most appropriate method for estimating water status in a given situation. Here, we present a simple comparative analysis to facilitate this choice for leaf-level measurements. Using desiccation of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Samsun) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Bojos) leaves as a model case, we measured parameters of spectral R and chlorophyll fluorescence and then evaluated and compared their applicability by means of introduced coefficients (coefficient of reliability, sensitivity, and inaccuracy). This comparison showed that, in our case, chlorophyll fluorescence was more reliable and universal than spectral R. Nevertheless, it is most appropriate to use both methods simultaneously, as the specific ranking of their parameters according to the coefficient of reliability may indicate a specific scenario of changes in desiccating leaves.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10610 - Biophysics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EH22_008%2F0004581" target="_blank" >EH22_008/0004581: TowArds Next GENeration Crops (TANGENC)</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    PLANT PHENOMICS

  • ISSN

    2643-6515

  • e-ISSN

    2643-6515

  • Volume of the periodical

    6

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    AUG

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    "0243-1"-"0243-14"

  • UT code for WoS article

    001310444300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85203282796