Sampling and Ranking of Protein Conformations Using Machine Learning Techniques Do Not Improve the Quality of Rigid Protein–Protein Docking
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F25%3A73633618" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/25:73633618 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01765" target="_blank" >https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01765</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01765" target="_blank" >10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01765</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Sampling and Ranking of Protein Conformations Using Machine Learning Techniques Do Not Improve the Quality of Rigid Protein–Protein Docking
Original language description
Rigid docking remains the most popular method of predicting protein–protein interactions in cases when experimental 3D structures of the complexes are not available. The docking often relies on known unbound (Apo) protein structures, which may differ significantly from their bound (Holo) forms. Modern machine learning (ML) based conformational sampling techniques allow generating ensembles of functionally relevant protein structures, which may be closer to their Holo forms and thus could improve the outcomes of the classical rigid protein–protein docking. Here, we sampled conformations of the protein subunits in 30 complexes from the novel PINDER data set with two state-of-the-art ML-based techniques and evaluated their docking performance using several physics-based, data-based, and ML-based scoring functions. We showed that such conformational sampling rarely produces structures that are closer to the Holo conformations than the corresponding Apo ones. Moreover, even when such conformations are generated, none of the tested scoring functions were able to prioritize and rank them correctly. Our work highlights critical limitations in the current ML-enhanced rigid protein–protein docking workflows and emphasizes the need for new approaches that can better utilize the potential of modern techniques for conformational generation and scoring.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10403 - Physical chemistry
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
1549-960X
Volume of the periodical
65
Issue of the periodical within the volume
19
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
10167-10179
UT code for WoS article
001572368300001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105018643888