Systematic Review And (Aystematic) Scoping Review: Similarities Or Differences?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F19%3A73595460" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/19:73595460 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333175346" target="_blank" >https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333175346</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Systematic Review And (Aystematic) Scoping Review: Similarities Or Differences?
Original language description
A scoping review is perceived in the family of systematic reviews as a type of brief information retrieval strategy. A systematic review (as an autonomous and prized strategy) is used to provide provisional results. In many cases, a published scoping review is the first step for processing e.g. a qualitative synthesis. However, it may be confusing to designate a study type as a "systematic scoping review", which inexperienced researchers can understand as a combination of a systematic and scoping review. A scoping review, however, has some similarities to, and at the same time differences from, a systematic review. Common features can be seen in the same phases of their elaboration, in the use of a research question, and in the work with studies (research, knowledge) – both types of reviews are in the same group, of the “review of literature” procedure. However, the nature and purpose of the research question remains a dominant difference. While the scoping review asks “What has already been published?”, “Where is the research gap”, “What literature (studies) is available on the topic and problem?”, etc., systematic reviews are considered a critical assessment strategy and an evaluation of the studies found that have met demanding criteria and precise work with the results, and thus provide valuable interpretations for providing information on current practice.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50902 - Social sciences, interdisciplinary
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Proceedings of IAC in Dresden 2019
ISBN
978-80-88203-13-1
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
5
Pages from-to
73-77
Publisher name
Czech Institute of Academic Education, z.s.
Place of publication
Praha
Event location
Dresden
Event date
Oct 25, 2019
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—