Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses?

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15510%2F22%3A73613603" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15510/22:73613603 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://jfootankleres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13047-022-00574-z" target="_blank" >https://jfootankleres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13047-022-00574-z</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00574-z" target="_blank" >10.1186/s13047-022-00574-z</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses?

Original language description

Background: Different multi-segment foot models have been used to explore the effect of foot orthoses. Previous studies have compared the kinematic output of different multi-segment foot models, however, no study has explored if different multi-segment foot models detect similar kinematic changes when wearing a foot orthoses. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of two different multi-segment foot models to detect kinematic changes at the hindfoot and forefoot during the single and double support phases of gait when wearing a foot orthosis. Methods: Foot kinematics were collected during walking from a sample of 32 individuals with and without a foot orthosis with a medial heel bar using an eight-camera motion capture system. The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) and a multi-segment foot model using the Calibrated Anatomical System Technique (CAST) were applied simultaneously. Vector field statistical analysis was used to explore the kinematic effects of a medial heel bar using the two models, and the ability of the models to detect any changes in kinematics was compared. Results: For the hindfoot, both models showed very good agreement of the effect of the foot orthosis across all three anatomical planes during the single and double support phases. However, for the forefoot, the level of agreement between the models varied with both models showing good agreement of the effect in the coronal plane but poorer agreement in the transverse and sagittal planes. Conclusions: This study showed that while consistency exists across both models for the hindfoot and forefoot in the coronal plane, the forefoot in the transverse and sagittal planes showed inconsistent responses to the foot orthoses. This should be considered when interpreting the efficacy of different interventions which aim to change foot biomechanics.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30211 - Orthopaedics

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2022

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

ISSN

1757-1146

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

15

Issue of the periodical within the volume

September

Country of publishing house

GB - UNITED KINGDOM

Number of pages

9

Pages from-to

1-9

UT code for WoS article

000850808700001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85137499800