All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Protective Purpose of the Contract and the Liability of an Expert Towards a Third Party in Czech, Austrian, and German Private Law

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F19%3A43917624" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/19:43917624 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2019-0016" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2019-0016</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2019-0016" target="_blank" >10.2478/bjlp-2019-0016</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Protective Purpose of the Contract and the Liability of an Expert Towards a Third Party in Czech, Austrian, and German Private Law

  • Original language description

    The aim of the paper is to describe the so-called protective purpose of the contract, by demonstrating the liability of experts for damage caused by an imperfect expert opinion, incorrect advice, or information. The comparative method will be used in conjunction with analyzing the Czech, Austrian, and German arrangements - their continuities and differences. Criteria for assessing whether this is a protective purpose of the contract and how these criteria vary in different legal frameworks are discussed in detail. The conceptual features of the expert as well as the assumptions of their responsibility for providing advice or information regulated in the individual jurisdictions are argued as well. The article concludes that the protective purpose of the contract is demonstrated accurately in the case of the liability of the expert for damage which has been established on the basis of a contract. These are in particular cases where an expert draws up an opinion on behalf of the parties on the basis of a contract which is, however, concluded with merely one party. In the event of a breach of the contract, the expert is also responsible for the damage caused to a party that has not concluded the contract with an expert.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Baltic Journal of Law &amp; Politics

  • ISSN

    2029-0454

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    12

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    LT - LITHUANIA

  • Number of pages

    23

  • Pages from-to

    163-185

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85082681032