The ambiguity and limitations of measuring firm-level multinationality: a theoretical and empirical exploration
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F24%3A43923872" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/24:43923872 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-09-2022-0137" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-09-2022-0137</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MBR-09-2022-0137" target="_blank" >10.1108/MBR-09-2022-0137</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The ambiguity and limitations of measuring firm-level multinationality: a theoretical and empirical exploration
Original language description
Purpose: This paper aims to explore the ambiguity and limitations of measuring firm-level multinationality (FLM) using theoretical and empirical comparisons of existing methods. The paper puts forward a list of five key aspects that collectively serve as a tool for researchers to select the most appropriate method for future research and as a basis for the future development of methods. Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, the author reviews existing methods of measuring FLM and consolidates findings into five key aspects. Secondly, the author uses the aspects to compare existing methods theoretically, and subsequently, the author groups them into three distinct streams. Thirdly, the author compares existing methods across a sample of the 35 largest European MNEs by sales in 2020 to identify and demonstrate the ambiguity and limitations of these methods. Findings: The author identifies the five key aspects of measuring FLM: framework, aggregation, segmentation, metrics and indicators. Using empirical comparison, the author empirically confirms the limitations highlighted in the literature and shows the differences and inconsistencies among methods, which cause confusion rather than clarity in the extant literature. Additionally, the author emphasises that three distinct streams further drive the debate on the regional/global nature and present further limitations of methods not mentioned in the literature to date. Originality/value:This paper provides the most comprehensive review of the existing literature on FLM, resulting in five novel aspects of measuring FLM. The analysis of a sample of 35 European firms demonstrates and identifies the ambiguity and limitations of FLM-measuring methods.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50204 - Business and management
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF19_073%2F0016670" target="_blank" >EF19_073/0016670: Internal grants of Mendel University in Brno</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Multinational Business Review
ISSN
1525-383X
e-ISSN
2054-1686
Volume of the periodical
32
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
22
Pages from-to
137-158
UT code for WoS article
001049070600001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85168158502