All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

What is more suitable for kohlrabi fertilization - Digestate or mineral fertilizers?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F15%3A43907435" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/15:43907435 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/62156489:43310/15:43907435

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://acta.mendelu.cz/media/pdf/actaun_2015063030787.pdf" target="_blank" >http://acta.mendelu.cz/media/pdf/actaun_2015063030787.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563030787" target="_blank" >10.11118/actaun201563030787</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    What is more suitable for kohlrabi fertilization - Digestate or mineral fertilizers?

  • Original language description

    In a one-year vegetation pot experiment, we compared the effect of digestate from a biogas station and mineral fertilisers on yield and quality parameters of kohlrabi, variety Moravia. Four treatments were used in the trial: 1) untreated control, 2) urea, 3) digestate, 4) urea, triple superphosphate, KCl, MgSO4. The N dose was the same in treatments 2-4, 1.5 g N/pot. In treatment 4 the P, K and Mg doses corresponded to those supplied in the digestate treatment (3). The weight of single kohlrabi bulbs inthe unfertilised control was signifi cantly lower (39.2%) than in the urea treatment (100%) and the other fertilised treatments. After application of digestate (treatment 3) and mineral fertilisers (treatment 4), the weight of single bulbs significantlyincreased by 18.6 and 25.2%, respectively, compared with the urea treatment (2). The content of ascorbic acid did not diff er among the all four treatments (274-291 mg/kg). There were signifi cant diff erences between all fertilised trea

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    GD - Fertilization, irrigation, soil treatment

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Acta universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

  • ISSN

    1211-8516

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    63

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    5

  • Pages from-to

    787-791

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database