All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

To intervene or not to intervene? Positions of the member states towards the article 18 of the european border and coast guard proposal

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43310%2F19%3A43915764" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43310/19:43915764 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216224:14230/19:00110006

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103" target="_blank" >10.34135/sjps.190103</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    To intervene or not to intervene? Positions of the member states towards the article 18 of the european border and coast guard proposal

  • Original language description

    The paper is focused on how the &quot;migration crisis&quot; starting in 2015 in Europe have reshaped the attitude to the European level of border protection. The basic question is how different are the competences of European Border and Coast Guard Agency (EBCG) from the previous FRONTEX and what was the role sovereignty played in it. The paper has a character of a qualitative study where the authors compare the proposal for EBCG, mainly its Article 18 establishing the &quot;right to intervene&quot; in the proposal, with the final version of the document and analyzes the position of the Member states based on their posititions within the Council to the parts of the proposal that were most connected to sovereignty. The analysis is based on data collection from officials from various member states that were part of the negotiations. Apart from this &quot;hidden agenda&quot; the authors also analyze public statements by high-ranking government officials that often commented on the proposal.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Slovak Journal of Political Sciences

  • ISSN

    1335-9096

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    19

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    17

  • Pages from-to

    43-59

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85066614852