Do perceived and calculated ecosystem services affect residents' human well-being differently? --A comparison study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43310%2F25%3A43927404" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43310/25:43927404 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Do perceived and calculated ecosystem services affect residents' human well-being differently? --A comparison study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China
Original language description
Understanding the relationship between ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being is critical for sustainable development. However, ES are often quantified in either resident-perceived or model-measured perspective, whether this would cause a difference in its relationship with human well-being is poorly understood. By integrating biophysical models and household surveys, we used the method of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to compare how perceived (resident-based) and calculated (model-based) ES influence human well-being in China's Guanting Reservoir basin. Results revealed that provisioning services consistently enhanced human well-being in both perspectives, with influence coefficients ranging from 0.134 to 0.222. Discrepancies emerged in pathways among regulating, supporting, and cultural services, as residents' perceptions contradicted the results derived from calculated ES. These differences highlight the gap between public perception shaped by socio-cultural narratives and biophysical realities, and emphasize the need for multi-perspective approaches in the valuation of ES to align with residents' well-being.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10508 - Physical geography
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Applied Geography
ISSN
0143-6228
e-ISSN
1873-7730
Volume of the periodical
184
Issue of the periodical within the volume
November
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
17
Pages from-to
103765
UT code for WoS article
001568709800002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105014760531